Proposal #676
| Proposer | (47927) Michael Paoletti (mochoolp@gmail.com) obscode: PMIG |
|---|---|
| Assigned To | (3663) Dirk Terrell |
| Date Submitted | Feb. 18, 2026 |
| Status | Allocated |
| Priority | Normal |
| Proposal | Observer code: PMIG Exoplanet observations 03/15/2026 6:30 Ic series of fifteen images taken starting at the times listed above. |
Targets
| Target Name | RA (H.HH) | Dec (D.DD) | Magnitude | Observation Frequency | Expiration Date | Proprietary Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASP-43 | 10.327225 | -9.80628 | 12.3 | 0 | Aug. 30, 2026 | No |
Plans currently in place
Comments
- (47927) Michael Paoletti — Feb. 20, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
The dates I entered are off, they should be
March 12, and March 16, based on UTC time.- (4726) Kenneth Menzies — March 3, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
Committed to BSM_S. What is your intent of this brief time series proposal? Does this time interval cover a transit? 15 images at 60 sec will not cover the entire indicated time interval?
- (47927) Michael Paoletti — March 3, 2026, 11:12 p.m.
Ken, it's my first proposal as well as one observing exoplanet transit. So... was concerned about tying up resources for around two hours. If there is a willingness, the UTC time/dates
Start 13:30 -> 15:40 for March 10
Start 10:40 -> 12:50 for March 15
As far as exposures, I really did not know what site was being used nor aperture, QE etc....to calculate that.I noticed Ic being used, not sure what that translates to. I will research that.
Thank You- (47927) Michael Paoletti — March 4, 2026, 1:12 a.m.
Sorry it's the filter!
- (4726) Kenneth Menzies — March 4, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
Just explain what you want to do. Let us decide whether we want to approve it or we will provide a reason why not. Do you want to image a full transit? What are you going to do with the images/data?
If so, select appropriate an interval (with some time outside of transit). Just collecting a few images (15), that will not cover that interval, will not provide any useful lightcurve. That would be a waste of time. Identify/select what aavsonet scope will have darkness during that interval (always work in UTC). Note that you now have identified a third different date/time? Which of the three intervals is correct?
Yes, Ic is the filter that you identified in the proposal..
- (47927) Michael Paoletti — March 7, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
The intent with this target is primarily to be training exercise, using the captured images in AstroImageJ to plot the measurements. I intend to simultaneously collect data/images at my site and equipment. In near future, observations, once I feel comfortable with my science data, would to import the data to AED.
- (4726) Kenneth Menzies — March 7, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
Assume BSM-S. Select a transit that is visible during nighttime there. Select an interval that provides the entire transit plus about 1/2 hour on each end. Request/identify this interval in UTC. Make sense?
- (47927) Michael Paoletti — March 7, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Yes, i do understand. While initially I was looking at sites in the Mid or western US. Looking at BSM-S the +/- 30min ingress regress for both dates should provide full coverage at that site and with the start nearly 2 hrs after sunset ( second date ) and over 4 hrs, at end of observation pre-sunrise ( first date). Even the airmass numbers are great.
- (4726) Kenneth Menzies — March 8, 2026, 1:44 p.m.
Would you state the date/time interval once more below in UTC just to make sure I understand them? Select a couple of transits a few days in the future so I have time to get the plan together. The weather may not cooperate.
- (47927) Michael Paoletti — March 8, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
Target Wasp-43 - RA 10:19:37.96 - DEC -09:48:23.20
Mag ~12.5 - Duration ~ 70 minutes (ingress-egress)
Date: 3-15-2026
Start and end of imaging times which includes (+30min ingress/egrees)
Transit UTC:
2026-03-15 10:39
2026-03-15 12:49Transit UTC:
2026-03-19 12:16
2026-03-19 14:26Transit UTC:
2026-03-24 09:25
2026-03-24 11:35Transit UTC:
2026-04-06 09:48
2026-04-06 11:58I gave 4 transit dates, pick any or all.
Comments on this proposal are closed.