Proposal #557
Proposer | (50010) Augusto Damineli (augusto.damineli@gmail.com) obscode: DAUA |
---|---|
Assigned To | (3663) Dirk Terrell |
Date Submitted | Sept. 11, 2024 |
Status | Allocated |
Priority | Normal |
Proposal | Project: The 2025.7 periastron passage of eta Carine This star is a prototype of LBV stars and is an eccentric binary (p=2023d e=0.9) with wind-wind collision. It has been brightening in the last 4 orbital cycles, revealing an increasingly prominent peak in photometry and line intensity. This seems to be due to the decreasing extinction of an occulter intervening in our line-of-sight (Damineli et al. 2024, Gull et al. 2023). The exact behavior of the light-curve is not presently known, especially the evolution of the U-V color index. The dissipating occulter covers the so-called bore-hole (Madura & Owocki 2012) which is expected to be a very hot spot revealing the sub-photosphere of the primary star. In the long-term, the bore hole should change to bluer the color index, especially the U-V, which measures the Balmer jump. Our goal is to monitor the UBV magnitude of eta Car through the year 2025 at a cadence of: Since the comparison in the field (HD303308) is ~4 magnitudes weaker, we need 100 images per filter per visit to be coadded to do not degrade the signal-to-noise of the target. The comparison star is at 1 arcmin North of the target. Exposure time Target magnitudes : V=4.0; B=4.6; U=4.0 |
Target | RA (H.HH) | Dec (D.DD) | Magnitude | Telescope | Observation Frequency | Expiration Date | Proprietary Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eta Car | 10.751000 | -59.68453 | 4.0–4.6 | BSM_S | 5 | Dec. 30, 2025 | No |
Comments
- (4726) Kenneth Menzies — Sept. 30, 2024, 7:37 p.m.
committed to BSM_S
- (50010) Augusto Damineli — Nov. 13, 2024, 12:59 a.m.
I don't know how the AAVSONET system works...I'm leaning som comments, waiting for help.
1- some setups were chosen because IO had the OC61 telescope in mind. Then I ask for some changes:
a) filters should be SU,B,V. (instead of UBV)
b) the exposure times should be at least 10X per filter, instead of 0.05 seconds.
c) the cadence of observations in the proposal is still validQ1- How can I get a testing run for the expositions?
Q2- When this can be done?
Comments on this proposal are closed.