Proposal #75
Proposer | (2911) Michael Nicholas (MNICHOLAS5COX@gmail.com) obscode: NMI |
---|---|
Assigned To | (3663) Dirk Terrell |
Date Submitted | Aug. 27, 2017 |
Status | Accepted |
Priority | Normal |
Proposal | Proposer: Mike Nicholas – nmi Campaign 4 of the Kepler K2 Mission has observed the Pleiades for the development of “Halo” photometry. This new technique allows professional class telescopes to photometrically measure bright stars by avoiding the saturated center pixels and only measuring the nearby unsaturated pixels in the image. A recent paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.07462.pdf) discusses this technique as it was applied to the study of these B stars in Taurus. One hope for this tool is its application for follow-up Kepler missions and for future space telescopes such as the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). This proposal suggests there is value in (1) having BSM precision photometric “unsaturated” data and image sets to support “Halo” photometry development and (2) for follow-up observations of the these blue pulsators. It should be noted that the afore-mentioned paper suggests that Maia variability (10 day) may be caused by rotational modulation resulting from a large chemical spot. Alcyone (NSV 15775) is the only target that does not have an AUID. These stars should be in reach of the Northern Hemisphere sites including Hamren, although I am unclear about the horizon limitations of the BSM stations. Name RA (2000) Dec (2000) AUID # Magnitude *Freq. d^−1 There are AAVSO comparison stars with B and V data in this field, although dimmer than the targets. The AAVSO database contains some visual observations It would seem appropriate to initially take twenty 0.5 second exposures for V and twenty 1.0 second exposures for B magnitudes to beat down scintillation and to determine SNR. It may also be useful to record low resolution spectra during each sequence. A single BSM image could capture all targets and comparison stars. Images would be send to VPHOT and personally archived. Given that the paper suggests variability of less than one day, it seems appropriate to have more than one BSM station making observations. Observations could start as soon as possible and extend for the remainder of the observational season. If coordination with the professional community is useful that might be accommodated. Other references: |
Target | RA (H.HH) | Dec (D.DD) | Magnitude | Telescope | Observation Frequency | Expiration Date | Proprietary Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electra | 3.747917 | 24.11333 | 3.0–3.7 | — | — | — | No |
Taygeta | 3.753469 | 24.46728 | 4.0–4.29 | — | — | — | No |
Maia | 3.763781 | 24.36775 | 3.0–3.87 | — | — | — | No |
Merope | 3.772103 | 23.94836 | 4.0–4.18 | — | — | — | No |
Alcyone | 3.791417 | 24.10500 | 2.0–2.87 | — | — | — | No |
Atlas | 3.819372 | 24.05342 | 3.6–3.65 | — | — | — | No |
Pleione | 3.819783 | 24.13672 | 4.83–5.38 | — | — | — | No |
Comments
- (3663) Dirk Terrell — Sept. 1, 2017, 12:13 p.m.
The TAC has agreed to approve time for a limited set of observations that can be used to show the achievable precision with the BSM systems. If sufficient precision can be achieved, the time allocation can be reconsidered.
- (2911) Michael Nicholas — Sept. 1, 2017, 6:36 p.m.
A paper will be written to communicate the precision of the three Northern BSM telescopes utilizing the data from these bright stars. The proposer assumes that 5 nights of good data will be required and will communicate this request to the BSM Dispatcher.
Thank you,
Mike - nmi
Comments on this proposal are closed.